That vulcan...

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by ginge, Aug 31, 2006.

  1. ginge

    BRC Guest

    The Typhoon you mean. Well it has a higher flying altitude, longer
    range, more versatile, the aircraft quite simply is superb, although an
    absolute s*d to support!! And having 4 countries involved in the
    design, build etc is a nightmare not only logistically, but also in
    specs and build quality. The latest version is coming along nicely
    shall we say and the IPT is doing a stirling job, I'll get exact
    figures for you if you'd really like them.

    Having said that of course, the Lightning has always been a favourite
    of mine.
     
    BRC, Aug 31, 2006
    #21
    1. Advertisements

  2. ginge

    raden Guest

    It was on national breakfast news
     
    raden, Aug 31, 2006
    #22
    1. Advertisements

  3. ginge

    BRC Guest

    And hows Rusty these days? working hard on it?
    Is it in one piece yet? :)
     
    BRC, Aug 31, 2006
    #23
  4. He was a total idiot. Incirlik is a US Air Base.
     
    vulgarandmischevious, Sep 1, 2006
    #24
  5. Wasn't there some mention of previous monies being mis-used in a fashion
    by employing some company who charged greviously for their work?

    Might explain why 1.2mil is being sought if half of it is profit for
    somebody.
     
    Grimly Curmudgeon, Sep 1, 2006
    #25
  6. In uk.rec.motorcycles, Hog belched forth and ejected the following:
    I'd be smug if I were him, too.
     
    Whinging Courier, Sep 1, 2006
    #26
  7. ginge

    Beav Guest

    My thoughts exactly.


    --
    Beav

    VN 750
    Zed 1000
    OMF# 19
     
    Beav, Sep 1, 2006
    #27
  8. ginge

    Beav Guest

    I recall seeing a TV prog about the Lightning doing a test. Parked up on the
    runway with engines off, to 60,000ft and mach 2... About 3 minutes in total.


    --
    Beav

    VN 750
    Zed 1000
    OMF# 19
     
    Beav, Sep 1, 2006
    #28
  9. Beav wrote
    You bothered even thinking about it? You have too much time on your
    hands.
     
    steve auvache, Sep 1, 2006
    #29
  10. ^
    Insert 'beardy, jumpered prat'.
     
    Grimly Curmudgeon, Sep 1, 2006
    #30
  11. Just made it, eh? I suppose they were stationed on all the East and
    North airfields to intercept Soviet bombers. I wonder how effective they
    would actually have been given the fairly shit missiles they had in
    their day.

    50 fucking years ago we were making stuff like that; half a century,
    ffs.
     
    Grimly Curmudgeon, Sep 1, 2006
    #31
  12. ginge

    Ben Guest

    ^ rich,
     
    Ben, Sep 1, 2006
    #32
  13. ginge

    Hog Guest

    Then again the Ruskie bombers were incredibly fucking slow.
    I recal BAE giving the airforces a chance to intercept a Concorde
    passing national airspace at full chat. The Mk II was the only one to
    achieve an intercept vector.
    Well now we have to fund the socially incapable instead. Apparently.
     
    Hog, Sep 1, 2006
    #33
  14. ginge

    Andy Bonwick Guest

    That was the point I tried to get over to him but he wasn't having any
    of it. He was as thick as pigshit but very obstinate.
     
    Andy Bonwick, Sep 1, 2006
    #34
  15. ginge

    Andy Bonwick Guest

    Which means they were probably working on the idea during WW11.
     
    Andy Bonwick, Sep 1, 2006
    #35
  16. ginge

    Hog Guest

    No just after, once we had our hands on German metallurgical and
    propulsion technology
     
    Hog, Sep 1, 2006
    #36
  17. Oh, I don't mind his richness at all. It's his air of smugness that gets
    up my nose. I get the feeling the smuggishness was always there,
    pre-dating the riches.
     
    Grimly Curmudgeon, Sep 1, 2006
    #37
  18. In principle it's dead simple - if one is good, then two is better. Take
    two engines, strap on a set of wings and something to hold the pilot. It
    it goes fast enough it won't fall out of the sky.

    Obviously it took a bit more than that to actually make it work
    properly, but considering the times it was an amazing bit of kit.
     
    Grimly Curmudgeon, Sep 1, 2006
    #38
  19. ginge

    Hog Guest

    They were amazingly reliable for what they were and how they were
    designed/built, other than the odd in-flight fire which did not impede
    the ejector seat. Both pilots I've met had ejected under those
    circumstances.
     
    Hog, Sep 1, 2006
    #39
  20. ginge

    Scraggy Guest

    I always thought of the E type Jag in the same terms;
    'Kin big engine, coupla seats, wheels, er, that is all.
     
    Scraggy, Sep 1, 2006
    #40
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.