Tilley pleads guilty to bogus 205-mph charge

Discussion in 'Bay Area Bikers' started by Tim Kreitz, Dec 25, 2004.

  1. Tim Kreitz

    Tim Kreitz Guest

    WFT? <http://www.startribune.com/stories/462/5153522.html>

    "A 20-year-old Stillwater motorcyclist charged with going 205 miles per
    hour down Hwy. 61 in September pleaded guilty on Wednesday in Wabasha
    County District Court to speeding and was sentenced to 200 hours of
    community service. Judge Terrence Walters placed Samuel Tilley on
    probation for a year and ordered him to pay $125 in court and probation
    fees, said the Wabasha County attorney's office. He will not serve any
    jail time. He also admitted not having a proper motorcycle license.
    Under a plea agreement, a reckless-driving charge was dropped. The
    agreement states that Tilley was going 205 mph in a 65 mph zone 12
    miles south of Wabasha. He was clocked by a State Patrol pilot on Sept.
    18 during the Flood Run, a motorcycle charity event."

    In case you don't remember this case, here's a refresher:
    <http://superbikeblog.blogspot.com/2004/09/sportbiker-given-bogus-ticket-for.html>

    I don't get it. In Texas, a speeding ticket can easily be thrown out of
    court if it can be shown that the officer made a mistake or otherwise
    performed his duties in an incompetant manner. Since exact speed
    calculation serves as the prima facie evidence that potentially proves
    the charge, showing the court that the speed overage was arrived at by
    either negligent or -- more likely -- dishonest law enforcement
    practices, will usually result in dismissal of the case (in Texas,
    anyway).

    That aside, the saddest aspect of this situation is not that Tilley
    pled guilty to a crime he did not commit, but that he fell victim to a
    bloated, overly-powerful law enforcement entity that was attempting to
    do little more than generate revenue for itself. It is unsettling to
    know that we, as a citizenry, allow cops to sqaunder our tax dollars by
    using multi-million dollar helicopters (that cost $500 to $1500 per
    hour to operate, on average) to chase down pimply-faced kids on
    sportbikes. Meanwhile, murders, robbers, vandals, and thieves run
    rampant as the police have a grand time playing with their
    taxpayer-purchased toys.

    If Tilley had done what he did in Italy, Germany, Spain, or even
    pre-1999 Montana, he would've gotten little more than a smile and a
    wave from the cops. Instead, he got screwed because the citizenry,
    police, and justice system of his community are comprized largely of a
    bunch of boobs.
     
    Tim Kreitz, Dec 25, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Tim Kreitz

    Turby Guest

    Well-endowed women of the world are righteously insulted by that
    remark, I'm sure.
     
    Turby, Dec 25, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Yep...no danger at all to the public from an unlicensed, uninsured 20yo
    going at least 100mph over the speed limit.

    It was just a ploy to get his money.

    Shit, man, if it were about revenue enhancement, wouldn't the penalty be
    far greater than $125? That's about the price in CA for a ticket going 1-15mph
    over. It would have been closer to $1000 here. Plus at least a temporary
    impoundment of the bike.
     
    Jason O'Rourke, Dec 25, 2004
    #3
  4. he wasn't going 205, thats been pretty much established, there's no way in
    hell his bike could have gone much over about 160 flat out downhill w/ a
    tailwind.

    So, how fast WAS he going? you're assuming 100+ over the limit, but the
    only evidence is an impossible speed... the guy doing the timing was
    flying a plane solo and simultaneously stopwatch timing two bikes that
    were almost a 1/2 mile apart (according to the riders reports on various
    online forums).
     
    John R Pierce, Dec 25, 2004
    #4
  5. So at what speed does he no longer pose a risk, being unlicensed, uninsured?
    Are you going to claim he was not going triple digits now?

    The 205 part was clearly suspect. But the reckless driving - sure doesn't
    look like it.
     
    Jason O'Rourke, Dec 25, 2004
    #5
  6. message SNIP
    The speed isn't the reckless thing. The reckless thing was
    no license and no insurance. The speed issues you bring up
    are a shite old LIE and not even good science.

    OBTW...you must be one of those punks on a sport bike that
    can't keep up with a 25 year old gold wing. I love passing
    you little wannabe's.


    --
    Nefarious Necrologist 42nd Degree
    Some people ride, some just like to show off their butt
    jewelry once in a while.
    Dum vivimus, vivamus
    <:(3 )3~ <:(3 )3~ <:(3 )~ <:(3 )~
     
    Keith Schiffner, Dec 25, 2004
    #6
  7. Tim Kreitz

    bsr3997 Guest

    How about charging him with what he was really guilty of. Is riding
    without insurance reckless? Insurance isn't required in NH where I
    live. If it wasn't for his speed how would you have even known about
    the lack of insurance? Same goes for the lack of license.

    It was his speed that could have justified a reckless driving charge,
    even if an exact speed could not be determined. So why was that charge
    dropped and the speeding charge with the bogus mph kept? I suspect
    because they didn't want someone to beat the speeding charge in a high
    profile case like this. If it can be shown that they were off by 50
    mph in this case, don't you think that might get used in arguing a case
    where someone is just 20 over?

    So they cut a deal, dropping a charge they could have made stick, and
    reduced the punishment, to make pleading guilty to the bogus charge
    look better.

    Why not lower the speed they were charging him with? Because that's
    not how things are supposed to work in this country. You don't just
    throw charges and then see what you can make stick, though that does
    seem like a common tactic these days. He was charged with 205 mph,
    which he was obviously not doing.

    Bruce
     
    bsr3997, Dec 25, 2004
    #7
  8. Tim Kreitz

    Paul Cassel Guest

    186 mph.
     
    Paul Cassel, Dec 25, 2004
    #8
  9. Tim Kreitz

    Stephen! Guest

    Yah... THERE's an unbiased source...
     
    Stephen!, Dec 25, 2004
    #9
  10. Tim Kreitz

    Stephen! Guest


    He knew what he was doing. You just wait and see... This isn't the last
    you'll hear of this.
     
    Stephen!, Dec 25, 2004
    #10
  11. Somewhere over 100...that would depend on the road...I have no pity for the guy,
    esp given that he's an unqualified rider. So if you think the cops exaggerrated
    his speed by more than 100%, let's talk. If not, STSTFU.
    I have 80,000 miles on two boxers, mostly lanesplitting in commute traffic.
    Pass me at your own risk...I'm not gonna care. Totally irrelevent to the
    topic at hand too.

    If you want to talk about persecution from the Marin CHP, I'm all with you.
    But this kid got a sweet deal, not a raw one.
     
    Jason O'Rourke, Dec 25, 2004
    #11
  12. Tim Kreitz

    Rich Guest

    Did you mean 186,000 mps?

    Rich, Urban Biker
     
    Rich, Dec 26, 2004
    #12
  13. Tim Kreitz

    cstatman Guest

    (Jason O'Rourke) wrote in
    IN last month's WIRED magazine, there was a beautiful article by Buzz
    Aldrin. Yes, the SECOND man to walk on the moon.

    I won't detail it here, but the summary was "we have become so 'risk
    averse' and want such a guarantee of safety that we have stopped
    adventuring, and wil not be able to make a spaceflight soon"

    what does this have to do with some jackass kiddo speeding? Not much,
    EXCEPT! ya'll care WAY too much about 'danger to the public' and it's
    startin to make me wonder if it's part of what is holding us back from
    being a great nation.

    "i'm scared. I want a guarantee of safety!"

    screw that. I wanna do a line of crank, wash it down with a shot of wild
    turkey, then see if I can'd kick that guy's ass at the Sacramento Mile!

    wake up. Safety is an illusion. When you give up your rights for the
    promise of safety, all is lost. It's btter to die standing, than live
    on your knees.


    --
    Assuring you of my best intentions at all times,

    Charles Statman
    Rocket Scientist/Wonderboy/Women's Legs Shaven

    DoD the Un-Numbered One
     
    cstatman, Dec 27, 2004
    #13
  14. I'm with you...**** THE PUBLIC! Those unwashed scared
    shitless little apes can kiss my hairy white ass...I'm only
    nice and polite because my parents taught me to be polite
    and nice to the mentally handicaped.
    Hmm, skip the crank I'll settle for gel caps with a proven
    level of 1,200mcg and chase that with a half liter of
    Bacardi 151 mixed with a half liter of Mega Jolt...THEN mega
    dose some B6/12 for giggles.

    I'd rather live now than arrive safely at a miserable death
    supported against my will by enough machines to take the
    Chinese army to the moon.

    --
    Nefarious Necrologist 42nd Degree
    Some people ride, some just like to show off their butt
    jewelry once in a while.
    Dum vivimus, vivamus
    <:(3 )3~ <:(3 )3~ <:(3 )~ <:(3 )~
     
    Keith Schiffner, Dec 27, 2004
    #14
  15. Tim Kreitz

    Dave Slavik Guest


    W00t! Yay for the Mad Texan! ;)

    Now git yer ass up to SF and we can play chicken with cab drivers (Which is
    why I need to replace my left side signals....I lost, hahahha) :D
     
    Dave Slavik, Dec 27, 2004
    #15
  16. Sounds like the usual old man whining about how great it used to be. I hadn't
    noticed America stopping being a great nation, myself.

    Want to go as fast as your bike can...lots of tracks out there. And it's not
    exactly a trying process to get a license. Esp compared to the rest of the world.

    Risk averse is wise when your risks put others at risk. I don't skydive over
    large population centers either. Basic courtesy should I **** up, no?
     
    Jason O'Rourke, Dec 27, 2004
    #16
  17. Tim Kreitz

    LIW Guest

    So the next time you're racing at Infineon, and some cranked up, drunk takes
    you off at the knees because he's going for it through the turn, and you
    spend the rest of your life in a wheel chair, we'll know that at least you
    approved of his behavior.

    Crank it up, drink it up, wind it up, and let's see how many people we can
    kill today!! Freedom means never having to be responsible for the safety of
    others!!

    Sounds like a REAL dumb rally cry.
     
    LIW, Dec 27, 2004
    #17
  18. WOW! You kids are REALLY REALLY STUPID! Freedom means
    even more responsibility than being told what to do and
    always doing what you are told to do. It is infinitely more
    difficult than being another bleating sheep...damn kids
    these days.
    Problem is not enough blood sport these days. Not blood
    sport involving animals...nope blood sport involving people.
    --
    Nefarious Necrologist 42nd Degree
    Some people ride, some just like to show off their butt
    jewelry once in a while.
    Dum vivimus, vivamus
    <:(3 )3~ <:(3 )3~ <:(3 )~ <:(3 )~
     
    Keith Schiffner, Dec 27, 2004
    #18
  19. Tim Kreitz

    Bownse Guest

    X-No-archive: yes
    Actually your argument is specious, since it crosses the boundary of
    personal responsibility and brings actual harm to another. Most
    current traffic laws are based on the illegal premise of prior
    restraint and the possibility that something bad MIGHT happen
    somewhere in the future.

    The argument of personal choice+personal liability/responsibility
    deals with harming no one other than yourself from your choices (your
    family and harm to it from your death as a result of your choice is
    between you and your family). That's the apple to your onion of
    personal choice devoid of all personal responsibility/liability. That
    your is so frequently used as a counterpoint to the apple is a
    testimony about the ability/desire of current generations desire to
    seek the ease of servitude over the struggle of freedom.
    --
    Mark Johnson, Ft. Worth, TX
    http://www.bikes-n-spikes.org
    "Stupidity cannot be cured with money, or through education, or by
    legislation. Stupidity is not a sin, the victim can't help being
    stupid. But stupidity is the only universal capital crime, the
    sentence is death, there is no appeal, and execution is carried out
    automatically and without pity." ~ Robert Heinlein
     
    Bownse, Dec 27, 2004
    #19
  20. Tim Kreitz

    Brandon High Guest

    No need to. That's what hospitals are for.

    -B
     
    Brandon High, Dec 27, 2004
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.