[QUOTE] Industrial action is unlawful if it has not been authorised by an independent ballot that meets a (large) number of criteria. The definition of industrial action is "a collective move away from normal working". So if it is normal to come to work(!), work overtime, follow certain practices etc and you stop doing it on a collective basis that constitutes industrial action - whether it's co-ordinated or not. [/QUOTE] So they've banned working to rule? That used to be the first step in any wage negotiation and probably my favourite time of the year at work. [QUOTE] The employer can dismiss if they wish (you are only protected taking lawful action) but more effectively they can seek damages from the union - whether or not they're behind the action. [/QUOTE] Surely the sensible option is to resign from the union, go on strike for a week and then re-apply to join the union? It's not the unions fault if you're not a member and choose to stay at home for a few days. [QUOTE] If you've just shut down the railways that's a lot of damages at ?90-?180 per minute. Individuals can seek damages too. This is why we (union's) repudiate unofficial action pronto and get accused by the ultras as "selling out the workers". [/QUOTE] Threatening to walk out was always a good way to get management to stop and think about what they were doing but that lever has been removed and nothing has been done to replace it. [QUOTE] The law is not fair and doesn't promote oneness and transparency, it is just there to frustrate action - but no surprise there.[/QUOTE] But the public love it.