What would the answer have been if you'd asked the same question about James Blunt before he was on? Personally I can't stand any of the above as 'artists' (with the possible exception of the Sugababes), but that doesn't mean they wouldn't be interesting guests. -- Krusty www.MuddyStuff.co.uk Off-Road Classifieds '02 MV Senna '03 Tiger 955i '96 Tiger '79 Fantic Hiro 250
Timberlake and Keating have already been on. They weren't the most irritating guests I've seen[1] [1] Jodie Kidd comes to mind.
Even so, why would her DNA be on a lap with LH? Unless he's not very good with his personal hygiene...
The bit during her lap where she does the tongue-clicking thing (as you might do when riding a horse) springs to mind and for some reason made me think she was a bit of a twat.
Who did - The Beatles or Buddy Holly and the Crickets? I think you will find the Beatles are on record as citing Holly as an influence. Not their only one, clearly. In any case Chuck Berry is a good example of a singer/songwriter long before them. PF
well, yes - but not just that - to me, she comes across as a one-trick- pony who thinks she's a multitalented genius.
WILL YOUNG MUST DIE. -- _______ ..'_/_|_\_'. Ace (b.rogers at ifrance.com) \`\ | /`/ `\\ | //' BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, DFV#8, SKA#2, IBB#10 `\|/` `
The point is still valid, though. Even as a new band, more than half their recorded material was self-written. This was indeed mould-breaking, and helped open the door to the ideas that gave rise to the pop/rock explosion of the 60s and 70s. Up until their time 90%+ of hit records were simply a singer, or group, performing songs selected, and as instructed, by management. That model probably accounted for less than 50% by the 70s, and of course the proportional change is even more marked if we look at Albums rather than singles. -- _______ ..'_/_|_\_'. Ace (b.rogers at ifrance.com) \`\ | /`/ `\\ | //' BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, DFV#8, SKA#2, IBB#10 `\|/` `