[URL]http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0337945/[/URL] Fucking rubbish. Don't bother.
Seeing as you couldn't even be arsed to post the title, I don't think I'll even bother clicking the link.
I haven't read the book and I thought it was very good. Well-paced and inventive, and excellent effects. The nipper's certainly beginning to bloom which can only be a plus. You don't mention the hideous slow down in the middle though. It is a top film but it does get a bit slow.
At your level of childish retaliation I'm sure it's the closest you can get to orgasmic. Come to think about it, things are starting to fall into place....
Everything seemed pretty well-explained. There were a few minor things which were covered in more depth in the book (according to my companion) but nothing that caused me any problems. Maybe you're just getting thicker. Maybe HP is too much for you? PFCT; Yeah as they enter the pub there's a walking-through-mud pacing to it that's a stark and unwelcome contrast. Like pulling away, gathering speed and then ploughing into a swamp.
So nothing to do with aiming that at Ace who has pissed you off in an earlier thread and already said there was no point in clicking on titleless urls then?
Andrewr At Work left a note on my windscreen which said: [snipped] I managed to watch The Passion of The Christ yesterday and it wasn't particuarly riviting. I had hoped, acknowledging this was probably a long shot, something along the lines of 'Paul Daniels does Jersulem on a cocktail of acid, speed and alcohol'.
One of the real, true greats (and source of the term `paparazzo'). If you liked it, you'll like this: http://www.archiviotaziosecchiaroli.net/eng/ and especially: http://www.archiviotaziosecchiaroli.net/eng/zoom.php?id=6& http://www.archiviotaziosecchiaroli.net/eng/zoom.php?id=15& http://www.archiviotaziosecchiaroli.net/eng/zoom.php?id=14&
it pains me to admit it, but "Zoolander" has been one of the most enjoyable movies I've seen in recent years. I mean, it's a load of shit, but it's very enjoyable if you're in the right frame of mind.
Nothing wrong with that. Funny films for the sake of it. I'm secretly looking forward to Dodgeball, I usually enjoy those Stiller films. "If you can dodge a wrench you can dodge a ball" "Clang!"
no, no, no, yes - that's what I'm saying. I like pretty much all the Stiller movies I've seen (though I prefer the likes of "Mystery Men" to "Meet the Parents"). That said, I've yet to see an Adam Sandler movie that made me laugh at all. not heard of it. "A group of misfits enter a Las Vegas dodgeball tournament in order to save their cherished local gym from the onslaught of a corporate health fitness chain." sounds promising. I'm very much looking forward to "Glamorama", though that's a different kind of comedy completely.
<google> Hmmm. I assume you've read the book - is it as good as this review (http://www.goodreports.net/glaell.htm) suggests?
it's better than that review suggests. It's not for the squeamish, though - much more graffically violent than "American Psycho" (no, really) including much worse combinations of sexual and violent imagery. And I wouldn't recommend reading it to anyone even slightly homophobic or insecure in their own sexuality[1]. [1] the bisexual three-in-a-bed piece is particularly harrowing to read as a heterosexual male.
