Weight Watching

There is no such word as "virii" or "viri". It's "viruses".

I suggest that Sir gets a new dictionary...

 

It's pedants like you that ruin these fora^hums^h^h^hii oh bollocks...

;-)

 

At the rate we're going, the Great Plains will just be a sandy dustbowl in
75 years time. Then how will the Yanks get their SuperSized hamburger buns?

 

<G> It's amazing how much you learn from ukrm.

 

Really? well **** me pink... so it is.
Makes note to be less l33t.

 

Verdigris wrote:

Depends on how big your population is. I was using the term to include
all members of a species. The total population.

I've actually done this in a laboratory: taken a on-resistant

Different thing entirely.


--
Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
Alfa 116 Giulietta 3.0l (Really) Sprint 1.7 75 TS 156 TS S2
Triumph Speed Triple: Black with extra black bits
www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk

 

Not at all. But you made a very specific statement, which I refuted:

Verdi:

and which I stick to. Of course, there _may_ exists set(s) of
circumstances that _may_ lead to less virulent forms, but my initial
reaction was as much to your use of "not in the virus' interests"
(implying some sort of plan) as it was to your assumption that just
because something may be possible, it "will" happen.


--
_______
..'_/_|_\_'. Ace (brucedotrogers a.t rochedotcom)
\`\ | /`/ GSX-R1000K3 (slightly broken, currently missing)
`\\ | //' BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, DFV#8, SKA#2, IBB#10
`\|/`
`

 

[/QUOTE]

Yeah, from later postings it would seem so.

Not really - I think any characteristic would fit just as well, or
badly. But it'd be a lot better if you'd just used a conditional
tense. I paraphrase my previous statement: just because something may
be possible, doesnt mean it "will" happen.


--
_______
..'_/_|_\_'. Ace (brucedotrogers a.t rochedotcom)
\`\ | /`/ GSX-R1000K3 (slightly broken, currently missing)
`\\ | //' BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, DFV#8, SKA#2, IBB#10
`\|/`
`