Whats the bleeding point of that?

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Steve, Jun 23, 2010.

Page 2 of 2
  1. Steve

    Hog Guest

    Were the Ruskies not fighting the entire population though? It seems to me
    to be a very different war. And for that matter would the Ruskies have lost
    out so badly if we hadn't been arming the other side.

    WTF is arming the ragheads. I've wondered this before.

    Thinking about it though and looking back to WWII it's probably a lost cause
    because we don't commit the appropriate amount of troops. For overwhelming
    success you want 100's of thousands if not a million combat troops. So arm
    the national army to the nines and fro.
     
    Hog, Jun 26, 2010
    #21

    1. Advertisements

  2. Steve

    vulgarandmischevious Guest

    Pretty much the current situation. And they had a million troops
    there.
    Damn near identical.
    Irrelevant. The only person who ever beat the Afghans was Ghenghis
    Khan. The British retreated from Kabul in 1863 with the loss of
    15,000 troops.
     
    vulgarandmischevious, Jun 26, 2010
    #22

    1. Advertisements

Page 2 of 2
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads

  1. Whats the Difference? Parallel and Grey Imports

  2. problem after bleeding the clutch

  3. Brake Bleeding: How much to fully flush the front...

  4. point-point speed traps.

  5. whats was the name of that mob - hand bult racers

  6. re; Whats the deal with the threads??

  7. What's the point (and the legality) of that then?

  8. There's nothing like stating the bleeding obvious

Loading...