When can I ride?

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by John McGowan, Nov 2, 2005.

  1. John McGowan

    John McGowan Guest

    I passed my test a few weeks ago and sent of the form about a
    few days later but still haven't got my licence back. When can I
    ride a bike without L plates or a bigger bike? Do I have to wait
    for my licence to arrive? I'm getting desperate to buy the
    bigger bike of my dreams rather than my CG125!
     
    John McGowan, Nov 2, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. John McGowan

    Judge Guest

    As far as I know, the minute you're told you've passed, you're free to ride.
    The rest is formalities.
     
    Judge, Nov 2, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. John McGowan

    wessie Guest

    John McGowan emerged from their own little world to say
    You can remove the L plates before you leave the test centre. In fact,
    riding the CG125 on L plates is technically an offence IIRC.

    You can also ride a larger bike immediately (sub 33bhp if you passed your
    test on the CG125).

    The only issue might be if you want to test ride your chosen bike: a dealer
    might refuse if you can't produce a valid licence.
     
    wessie, Nov 2, 2005
    #3
  4. John McGowan

    John McGowan Guest

    Great news! Thanks.
    Yeah, that might be a problem. I went to a dealer today and they
    said I needed my licence to ride anything more than a 125 - and
    that as I was a new rider I wouldn't be covered by their
    insurance either so I couldn't have a test ride anyway! Probably
    cos I'm only 19. Anything's got to be better than the 125
    though, so long as it's warrantied for a bit I guess I'll be OK.

    Got to get myself some new cloth too, have been borrowing my
    brothers and he said I've got to get my own. Went to Infinity at
    the weekend - so much gear to chose from. Thought the hardest
    bit would be getting a bike. Is it all much the same and just
    down to how it looks/feels? Need jacket pants and boots. Big bro
    will probably want his spare helmet back too, when he gets a new
    girlfriend to ride on the back. I'll have about £300 left after
    buying a new bike - any advice?
     
    John McGowan, Nov 3, 2005
    #4
  5. John McGowan

    wessie Guest

    John McGowan emerged from their own little world to say
    Paging BGN. BGN to the customer service desk.
     
    wessie, Nov 3, 2005
    #5
  6. John McGowan

    BGN Guest

    If you need anyone to hold your hand while you're out shopping, let me
    know and I'll visit.
    How are you paying for your insurance? That'll be about £400 TPF&T
    (And don't skimp on the Theft part. More motorcycles are stolen in
    the UK than there are bought new)

    I've posted it here before.

    "My First Kit"

    £160 HJC Sy-Max Helmet
    £30 RST Waterproof gloves
    £90 Akito Python II Jacket
    £50 Nitro boots
    £10 Swift waterproof over-trousers
    £4 Neck tube

    That's £344, and all of it is new.

    HJC Sy-Max: You can easily get a helmet for less than that - I paid a
    premium because it had a flip up front. (RIP HJC SyMax
    <http://hayn.gotadsl.co.uk/bike/crash/helmet.jpg>)

    RST Waterproof gloves: I've just bought my second pair of waterproof
    gloves, same model but different colour, as I damaged my last ones by
    whacking the knuckle armour with my head on day. They were still
    waterproof. (RIP RST Waterproof gloves
    <http://hayn.gotadsl.co.uk/bike/crash/gloves.jpg>)

    Python II jacket is a fab piece of kit with many pockets - but if you
    do get a Python II then make sure that you get the OLD model, the now
    Python I is pants. Make sure it has the proper reflective tubing on
    it, and that it has a pocket above your arse. If you're XXL then I
    have a red/black Akito Cobra armoured motorcycle jacket going here if
    you want to make me an offer. It's been worn but it's just sitting in
    a bag now as it was an interim replacement while I sourced a decent
    model red/black Python II (RIP blue and black Python II
    <http://hayn.gotadsl.co.uk/bike/crash/jacket.jpg>)

    Nitro Boots took some abuse (and were crashed in early on in their
    life) and started to fall apart after about 7 months. Unlike the rest
    of my equipment, I didn't replace it with more Nitro boots, I bought
    something more expensive. (RIP Nitro Boots)

    Swift waterproof over-trousers were quite handy, and they didn't leak
    initially, but they died in an unfortunate accident. I will rebuy
    them sooner or later. (RIP Nitro Boots)

    Neck tube was quite nice. They come in different formats, from boob
    tubes for your neck, to more tailored thin cloths to Buffs. They Keep
    Your Neck Warm When It's Cold. My original neck tube died in an
    unfortunate accident when an ambulance crew decided that it wasn't
    good for me. (RIP Neck tube)
     
    BGN, Nov 3, 2005
    #6
  7. John McGowan

    dwb Guest

    You did take a photocopy, yes?
     
    dwb, Nov 3, 2005
    #7
  8. John McGowan

    flash Guest

    <fx Siren>
    Made up fact alert!
    Made up fact alert!
     
    flash, Nov 3, 2005
    #8
  9. John McGowan

    Ace Guest

    So nobody said it was _you_ that made it up.

    --
    _______
    ..'_/_|_\_'. Ace (brucedotrogers a.t rochedotcom)
    \`\ | /`/ GSX-R1000K3
    `\\ | //' BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, DFV#8, SKA#2
    `\|/`
    `
     
    Ace, Nov 3, 2005
    #9
  10. John McGowan

    CT Guest

    It's bollocks though. A quick poke around the MCIA website,
    http://www.mcia.co.uk givesL

    No. of m/cycles stolen in 2000: 36822 (est)
    No. of m/cycles registered in 2000: 121,908
     
    CT, Nov 3, 2005
    #10
  11. John McGowan

    BGN Guest

    That obviously doesn't take account of all of the bikes that were
    stolen before they were registered..... err, or something.
     
    BGN, Nov 3, 2005
    #11
  12. John McGowan

    Nicknoxx Guest

    wessie wrote:
    snip
    Is this true? What about two people sharing one bike, one passes their
    test before the other but wants to continue riding the 125 until perfect
    big bike arrives?


    --
    Nick Brooks

    GN125 ('till test passed)
    1960 SWB Landrover
    1974 Mercedes Camper Van
    Klein Attitude
    Golf VR6
    Combined vehicle age 90
     
    Nicknoxx, Nov 3, 2005
    #12
  13. John McGowan

    BGN Guest

    The L-Plates are to signify that the RIDER is LEARNING, not that the
    BIKE is learning.
     
    BGN, Nov 3, 2005
    #13
  14. John McGowan

    BGN Guest

    <me ponders> One can quite happily display L-Plates when one is having
    a driving lesson. If one is going back for further training after
    passing the test then one can display the L-Plate as it's a lesson.

    I wonder what the legal standing on this is. If you were doing an IAM
    or RSoPA course in an instructor's car, then there would be L-Plates
    on display even though a full licence would already be held.
     
    BGN, Nov 3, 2005
    #14
  15. John McGowan

    Nicknoxx Guest

    Buzzzzt. You have failed to answer the question. Which was "Is riding
    on L plates after you've passed your test technically an offence?"


    --
    Nick Brooks

    GN125 ('till test passed)
    1960 SWB Landrover
    1974 Mercedes Camper Van
    Klein Attitude
    Golf VR6
    Combined vehicle age 90
     
    Nicknoxx, Nov 3, 2005
    #15
  16. John McGowan

    BGN Guest

    No, it's not an offence.
     
    BGN, Nov 3, 2005
    #16
  17. John McGowan

    Nicknoxx Guest

    That's what I thought, so wessie was talking bollocks.

    --
    Nick Brooks

    GN125 ('till test passed)
    1960 SWB Landrover
    1974 Mercedes Camper Van
    Klein Attitude
    Golf VR6
    Combined vehicle age 90
     
    Nicknoxx, Nov 3, 2005
    #17
  18. John McGowan

    BGN Guest

    From Driving: The Essential Skills (ISBN 0-11-552224-7)

    ""
    L-Plates (D-Plates)

    You must display L-plates (D-plates) which conform to legal
    specifications, and which are clearly visitble from in front of the
    vehicle and from behind.

    If the vehicle is NOT being driven by a learner driver, the L-plates
    (D-plates should be removed or covered.
    ""

    It says they "should" be removed, not "must" be removed. How many
    driving instructors have you seen remove their L-plates at the end of
    the lesson, drive to the next person, put the L-plates back on
    again...

    AFAIK the only legal issue would be if someone was riding a motorcycle
    without L-plates when they legally needed them.

    When I was doing my motorcycle training the instructors own bike died,
    so he just used one of the riding school machines, which had L-plates
    both ends.

    Although I can't find it in the same book, I have read that they
    should only be used when a lesson is taking place. I wonder what the
    legal definition of a lesson would be. Would anyone else have to be
    present? If you've passed your full test then you can still go back
    for further driving lessons. I'm sure SWO will be along soon to give
    their view on it all.
     
    BGN, Nov 3, 2005
    #18
  19. John McGowan

    Ben Guest

    Wrong:

    http://www.highwaycode.gov.uk/28.htm#3

    "Vehicles. Any vehicle driven by a learner MUST display red L plates.
    In Wales, either red D plates, red L plates, or both, can be used.
    Plates MUST conform to legal specifications and MUST be clearly
    visible to others from in front of the vehicle and from behind. Plates
    should be removed or covered when not being driven by a learner
    (except on driving school vehicles).
    Law MV(DL)R reg 16 & sched 4 "
     
    Ben, Nov 3, 2005
    #19
  20. John McGowan

    Ben Guest

    No, one can't.
    See my other post.
     
    Ben, Nov 3, 2005
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.