Where that our money goes...

Yeah, right...

 

Fair enough, so you don't think he wanted to send troops to Iraq and
murder Iraqis. What other motive do you think he could have possibly
have had for sending armed troops to invade Iraq without provocation?

Nev..
'03 ZX12R

 

And you did. Any point in continuing?

 

JL wrote:

Ah, yes, but you are taller, younger, better looking, and seem to score
_much_ nicer women.

regards,
CrazyCam (btw don't get too excited, this is you versus "wee squeak".

 

Strange, but true!

GB

 

Much as I hate to agree with such a simplistic view of things,
yeah.


NFI if Micheal Moore's "FAHRENHEIT 9/11" leans more towards fact
or fiction (It's clearly none-of-the-above in-toto), but it's a
bloody eye-opener either way.


GB

 

Now... there is a guy that blatantly lies

Richard

 

But theres nothing wrong with succinctness either.

paulh

 

Hyperbole?

regards,
CrazyCam

 

It's all bullshit. From start to finish. Sort of sums up his whole
filmmaking career, really.

http://tinyurl.com/28hjy

I'd suggest you watch a copy of "FahrenHYPE 9/11" and "Michael Moore
Hates America" for an insight into the man and his methods.

 

Heheh I'll take all the compliments I can get

JL
(actually though, he's probably taller than me, Boxer has met us both -
what's the call John ?)

 

Actually no I don't think so - I think the Rodent is about 5'5 or 6
(from what I recall Boxer saying in a post a couple of years ago) I'm
only 5'4

JL

 

No it's not, widen your research to things other than the right wing
bile tanks.The rebuttals have been extensively rebutted !

There's some minor errors of fact (non consequential), however the
fairest criticism would be to say *some* of the facts used have been
presented in an unbalanced way to imply things that are at best unlikely
or more probably coincidental (not everything is a conspiracy). This
doesn't mean everything it covers is incorrect, it means some of it is
slanted. Most documentaries have a slant of some sort no matter how
objective the reporter is trying to be.

Like any reportage, be a bit skeptical, believe the bits that are
supported by documentation and or data. There's a grain of truth in it,
it's neither gospel truth nor complete fabrication.

Why does everything have to be black and white to some people ? Nothing
is all good or all bad (and that includes the Rodent and the Shrub* -
they both have some positive areas along with their downsides).

Perhaps, however there was probably 10 times as much effort put into the
research than your average fox news article...

JL
*Although it's easier to find positive things to say about Howard than
Bush, I'd be struggling for the latter

 

Give examples...

Fahrenheit 9/11 is not a documentary. It's a work of fiction.

Sorry. His "documentation and or data" is, if not a complete
fabrication, presented without context, misses crucial facts and is
deliberately misleading.

Exactly *what* did Moore get right?...

 

I never realised it was a black and white movie.

Nev..
'03 ZX12R

 

You want me to hold your dick for you while you have a slash too ?
http://justfuckingoogleit.com

Like I said "widen your research to things other than the right wing
bile tanks"

Try reading a wider range of information, not just fox.

Refer above.

JL

 

What, you mean try a few conspiracy theory sites?...

I don't read Fox, don't watch Fox, Fox isn't in my Bookmarks.

There's nothing there. You're my bitch, Littlerodent.

 

ummm... like Bush's presentment of the facts justifying the invasion of
Iraq?

Nev..
'03 ZX12R

 

Typing the word 'failure' into google brings up two top interesting results!

 

JL said....

Isn't Usenet convention such that whoever makes the claim gets to prove
it, not the other way around?