Whilst we're on the subject of cyclists.

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Krusty, Apr 13, 2011.

  1. Krusty

    Krusty Guest

    I am one now, but they're still complete cunts. It took me half an hour
    to do a ten minute journey last night, thanks to being stuck in a slow
    moving queue of traffic caused by a handful of lycra-clad wankstains
    riding two & three abreast on narrow country roads.

    Unfortunately the car at the front of the queue just sat there rather
    than leaning on the horn & forcing their way past. So they're a
    wankstain **** too.
     
    Krusty, Apr 13, 2011
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Krusty

    Derek Turner Guest

    That was just like Nige was in the room.
     
    Derek Turner, Apr 13, 2011
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. No excuse for that - arseholes.
    Timidity. Don't want to make a fuss and get shouted at.
     
    Grimly Curmudgeon, Apr 13, 2011
    #3
  4. Krusty

    nicknoxx Guest

    The argument is that they do it for safety to prevent cars pushing past
    when there's a vehicle coming the other way, but I don't buy it. Sure,
    ride well away from the kerb, or in pairs, to make vehicle approaching
    from behind slow down but once they've slowed there's no justification
    for not moving in and letting them past. Anyone who doesn't is a ****.
     
    nicknoxx, Apr 14, 2011
    #4
  5. Krusty

    Ben Guest

    Actually, they do it to shorten the length of road they take up to
    make overtaking easier.

    Imagine a club run of 60 odd riders. Which is easier to overtake

    a) 60 riders all single-breast riding a metre from the kerb so
    occupying about 2 metres of road space across and 100m in length.
    b) 60 riders two-abreast riding 0.5 and 1.5 metres from the kerb, so
    occupying about 2.5 metres of road space and 50m in length.

    The most dangerous situation for all parties happens when someone goes
    for the overtake and can't make it, meaning they need to push into the
    body of riders. That generally leads to people getting hurt so clubs
    deliberately shorten the length by riding two-abreast.

    And, as you say, it also give them more power to control the traffic
    around them to make sure everyone is safe.
     
    Ben, Apr 14, 2011
    #5
  6. Krusty

    nicknoxx Guest

    But they do it in small groups too so the argument that it's for the
    benefit of the overtaker is weak.
     
    nicknoxx, Apr 14, 2011
    #6
  7. Krusty

    Ben Guest

    In small groups it's so they can have a conversation.

    And frankly, if you haven't enough width of road to overtake two bikes
    side-by-side, you shouldn't be overtaking one either. You should use
    the same amount of room to overtake a pushbike as you would a car.
    Unfortunately most drivers seem to forget this.
     
    Ben, Apr 14, 2011
    #7
  8. Krusty

    Krusty Guest

    Thankfully.
     
    Krusty, Apr 14, 2011
    #8
  9. Krusty

    Jim Guest

    So I should fold the wing mirrors back and filter between them?
     
    Jim, Apr 14, 2011
    #9
  10. Krusty

    Hog Guest

    I'm firmly in the camp of "nothing should slow me down. at all"
     
    Hog, Apr 14, 2011
    #10
  11. Krusty

    Higgins Guest

    Maybe the inconsiderate cunts should ride in smaller groups.
     
    Higgins, Apr 14, 2011
    #11
  12. Krusty

    boots Guest

    What about paying road tax & insurance, sure it's been a while since
    we did that.
     
    boots, Apr 14, 2011
    #12
  13. Krusty

    davethedave Guest

    No need for folding. They'll fold back nicely as the slap the arses of
    the cyclists in question.
     
    davethedave, Apr 14, 2011
    #13
  14. Krusty

    Ben Guest

    You'll soon change your mind the more you cycle. Trust me.
     
    Ben, Apr 14, 2011
    #14
  15. Krusty

    Ben Guest

    It's only a matter of time.

    I should know better than to bite. But I had someone close enough
    today for their side window to touch my elbow, when the other side of
    the road was completely clear, so I'm not feeling particularly well
    disposed to crap drivers.

    All it takes is for the cyclist to wobble slightly, and you're on a
    death by dangerous driving charge. Have a care and some respect for
    other people (not you, boots, 'you' in general).
     
    Ben, Apr 14, 2011
    #15
  16. Krusty

    Hog Guest

    I understand your point but it mostly just isn't practical/acceptable for
    most people to be slowed to 5 or 10 mph
     
    Hog, Apr 14, 2011
    #16
  17. Krusty

    Ben Guest

    That is exceedingly rare, and the next set of traffic lights will make
    more of a difference to your journey time than a single cyclist.
     
    Ben, Apr 14, 2011
    #17
  18. Krusty

    Cab Guest

    Ben wibbled forthrightly:
    Quite. Whenever I've been caught behind a cyclist, it's generally only
    for a few seconds or so.
     
    Cab, Apr 14, 2011
    #18
  19. Yes. You'll stop and the cyclist won't.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Apr 15, 2011
    #19
  20. Krusty

    Krusty Guest

    Not a chance in hell. A large chunk of my evening cycling route is
    single track road, & if a car comes along in either direction, I stop &
    haul the bike onto the verge to let them through. I don't see why my
    hobby should cost someone else time, & especially money as they waste
    fuel having to slow down & then accelerate again. I'm not going to
    start riding through red lights or on the pavement either.

    I'm happy filtering past cars at speed on a motorbike with only a cm or
    two to spare, so have no reason to complain if cars do the same to me
    when I'm on a pushbike.
     
    Krusty, Apr 15, 2011
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.