[QUOTE] [QUOTE="darsy"] [QUOTE] <[email][/email]>: On Jul 12, 6:32 am, Timo Geusch <[email][/email]> wrote: Well, *I* do. [snip] look, you're an IT contractor working for an investment bank in the City - FFS, just throw all your old shite in a skip and buy something modern and reliable[1]. If you work for who I think you work for, then you should be getting paid a fair whack - just fucking spend the money, you tight git. Thing is that the K1100LT is *so* good at what it does and it's not a question of being tight. A well sorted K1100 is going to be more reliable than a modern BMW... er if you get past the odd critical collapse.[/QUOTE][/QUOTE] [QUOTE] fuck BMW.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE] I know people go on about the "curse of Timo", but as per Platy's MTBF thread, I reckon it's pure and simple that old crap is unreliable compared to modern stuff. BMW's problem is that they believe their own hype.[/QUOTE] Modern BMWs aren't any more reliable either,[/QUOTE] so people say - I had no problems with mine (only owned it for a year/ 8000 miles, mind) [QUOTE] and hardly anybody makes something that's comparable to a K1100LT. That's the reason while they're still popular.[/QUOTE] oxymoron alert! If this kind of bike were in fact "popular", more manufacturers would make this kind of bike. [QUOTE] Like the 1100 Pan Euro, because it's a better bike than the 1300.[/QUOTE] again, Pan Euros don't fit my definition of "popular". [QUOTE] Yes, I can think of one or two bikes that are as comfy (at least for me) and have the same kind of weather protection. They'd probably get me banned from UKRM for life, too.[/QUOTE] now I've no idea what you're on about.