Yuck...

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Steve Parry, Aug 19, 2008.

  1. Steve Parry

    Ace Guest

    What about the owner?
    --
    _______
    ..'_/_|_\_'. Ace (b.rogers at ifrance.com)
    \`\ | /`/
    `\\ | //' BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, DFV#8, SKA#2, IBB#10
    `\|/`
    `
     
    Ace, Aug 20, 2008
    #21
    1. Advertisements

  2. Steve Parry

    Muck Guest

    Compression ratio defines the efficiency limit to an otto cycle engine,
    the lower the compression ratio, the lower the theoretical maximum
    efficiency. I thought you had to be careful with old Harley engines, on
    account of their bolt together bottom ends. Hence the Harley limit of
    shaking its self apart, limits the power available. :)
     
    Muck, Aug 20, 2008
    #22
    1. Advertisements

  3. Steve Parry

    Eddie Guest

    Is that all? That's shit.
     
    Eddie, Aug 20, 2008
    #23
  4. Steve Parry

    Alex Ferrier Guest

    Sat at a table next to it, of course. Black open face
    lid and wrap around specs on the table. Glass of medium
    dry white in hand, recounting tales of past glories in
    his road racing days.
     
    Alex Ferrier, Aug 20, 2008
    #24
  5. Steve Parry

    Lozzo Guest

    Carbon fibre crutches leaning against the table?
     
    Lozzo, Aug 20, 2008
    #25
  6. Steve Parry

    Alex Ferrier Guest

    In a faux shotgun holster on the bike.
     
    Alex Ferrier, Aug 20, 2008
    #26
  7. Steve Parry

    Champ Guest

    Yep - looks right up Gyp's street.
     
    Champ, Aug 20, 2008
    #27
  8. Generalisation no.1...
    Long stroke engines tend to be pretty good at producing torque low down
    but usually run into breathing difficulties and waste fuel at higher
    revs.The trade-off is usually for torque and economy versus lack of
    outright power. Many existing long-stroke engines are throwbacks to the
    50s or before.
    Generalisation no.2...
    Most short stroke engines are bloody good all round, especially with
    multi-valve technology, which can compensate for the inherent lack of
    torque of a short stroke. Breathing at high revs is generally good.
    --
    Dave
    GS850x2 XS650 SE6a

    "It's a moron working with power tools.
    How much more suspenseful can you get?"
    - House
     
    Grimly Curmudgeon, Aug 20, 2008
    #28
  9. "When I was on the Island..."
    --
    Dave
    GS850x2 XS650 SE6a

    "It's a moron working with power tools.
    How much more suspenseful can you get?"
    - House
     
    Grimly Curmudgeon, Aug 20, 2008
    #29
  10. Steve Parry

    Andy Bonwick Guest

    You forgot to mention the lemonade in the dry white.
     
    Andy Bonwick, Aug 20, 2008
    #30
  11. Steve Parry

    Hog Guest

    Suuuuuuuuuure
     
    Hog, Aug 20, 2008
    #31
  12. Steve Parry

    Beav Guest

    That Russel Mitchell bloke [1] doesn't fit them so any copy of his "style"
    [2] of bike won't have them, coz the septics are followers in design rather
    than leaders.

    [1] Unfortunately he's English
    [2] If style means little more than bolting a pair of forks and a motor to a
    frame


    --
    Beav

    VN 750
    Zed 1000
    OMF# 19
     
    Beav, Aug 20, 2008
    #32
  13. Steve Parry

    Beav Guest


    <post corrected>


    --
    Beav

    VN 750
    Zed 1000
    OMF# 19
     
    Beav, Aug 20, 2008
    #33
  14. Steve Parry

    Beav Guest

    "(1550cc) MOTOR PUTTING OUT 105BHP"

    Just how fucking inefficient are yank twins. How does a 1098 achieve
    165HP with a 550cc deficit?

    By being able to rev. That means losing the pushrods, but getting the
    septics to move to overhead cams (or God forbid, a desmodromic type system)
    would be easier than getting Jonathon Ross to shut the **** up.

    --
    Beav

    VN 750
    Zed 1000
    OMF# 19
     
    Beav, Aug 20, 2008
    #34
  15. Steve Parry

    Hog Guest

    So you are saying at their respective rpm for peak bhp the HD and 1098 will
    be operating with equal efficiency? I think not.
     
    Hog, Aug 21, 2008
    #35
  16. Steve Parry

    Ace Guest

    I think what he's saying is not that, but that the HD is likely to be
    much more efficient, in terms of BHP/unit fuel, than the 1098. I'm
    inclined to agree.

    --
    _______
    ..'_/_|_\_'. Ace (b.rogers at ifrance.com)
    \`\ | /`/
    `\\ | //' BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, DFV#8, SKA#2, IBB#10
    `\|/`
    `
     
    Ace, Aug 21, 2008
    #36
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Similar Threads
Loading...